Question:
Folks: I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted about the tragic accident on the QM2. The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no advertising for TA’s. Hypocrite – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Folks: >I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted >about the tragic accident on the QM2. >The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of >the Charter, they include. >Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration >Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus >Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn >Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian >Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation >Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium >Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea >Phil >Seacruise >rec.travel.cruises >(unmoderated) >CHARTER >Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information >and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not >be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and >lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise >ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship >personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. >Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly >welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money >back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. >cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own >cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise >industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion >will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. >Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion >provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within >postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore >excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs >to be familiar with. >An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. >These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). >Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write >reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the >FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking >into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive >listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the >FAQ’s. >In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion >on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific >cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming >personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly >urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a >minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to >rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel >newsgroups. >End of Charter >Link to the FAQ — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm >Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our >charter bit the dust many moons ago — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com >Link to the Group cruise pages — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm >Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm
Response:
I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of people with your comments. Phil Seacruise – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no > advertising for TA’s. > Hypocrite >Folks: >I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted >about the tragic accident on the QM2. >The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of >the Charter, they include. >Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration >Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus >Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn >Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian >Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation >Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium >Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea >Phil >Seacruise >rec.travel.cruises >(unmoderated) >CHARTER >Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information >and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not >be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and >lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise >ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship >personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. >Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly >welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money >back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. >cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own >cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise >industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion >will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. >Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion >provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within >postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore >excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs >to be familiar with. >An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. >These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). >Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write >reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the >FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking >into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive >listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the >FAQ’s. >In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion >on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific >cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming >personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly >urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a >minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to >rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel >newsgroups. >End of Charter >Link to the FAQ — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm >Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our >charter bit the dust many moons ago — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com >Link to the Group cruise pages — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm >Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
>I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of >people with your comments. >Phil >Seacruise > What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no > advertising for TA’s. > Hypocrite
Let me make it plain so that you won’t "loose allot" anymore. You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other reason that to expose your business to an international market of known cruisers who you want to sell cruises, etc to. I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your business. The Charter prohibits advertising. I’ll give you a minute and let that sink in. You have now established yourself as the Ultimate RTC Hypocrite Among TA’s. I’ll give you a life and let that sink in.
Response:
Hey Queenie: Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your mouth. . Seacruise is the first Cruise Chat Channel that was started in 1996. We are a non profit group that accepts no advertising or no money from Travel Agents. All moneys are free will donations from those on Seacruise. Seacruise agreed to keep the Charter and Post the Charter several years ago. As part of the Charter there is suppose to be a FTP site for reviews. Since FTP sites are pretty much a thing of the past http://seacruisereviews was born. As a matter of clarification SeacruiseReviews (Steve) also posts Group Cruises submitted to him as one post. You see there was a problem with Spam on RTC and it was agreed upon that Seacruise would provide this service FREE OF CHARGE to those that use it in one simple message. We accept nothing in return, except a simple Thank You. SeacruiseChat and SeacruiseReviews gains NOTHING. We are doing RTC a service and if you had done some research on Google you would have found this out, but you didn’t. Now I am going to suggest that you visit the links I listed and tell me where we are a business? Also visit this link http://seacruisereviews.com/rtccharter.htm and read the top of the page. I hope this clarifies any misunderstanding you have on what Seacruise is or about. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager > You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other reason > that to expose your business to an international market of known cruisers > who you want to sell cruises, etc to. > I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. > You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your business. The > Charter prohibits advertising.
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of >people with your comments. >Phil >Seacruise >> What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no >> advertising for TA’s. >> Hypocrite >Let me make it plain so that you won’t "loose allot" anymore. >You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other >reason that to expose your business to an international market of >known cruisers who you want to sell cruises, etc to. >I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. >You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your >business. The Charter prohibits advertising. >I’ll give you a minute and let that sink in. >You have now established yourself as the Ultimate RTC Hypocrite Among >TA’s. >I’ll give you a life and let that sink in.
Whoosh! That was the sound of reality slipping through your fingertips, Queenie. Trahn Where are the weapons of mass destruction?
Response:
> I’ll give you a second and let that sink in.
I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
>Hey Queenie: >Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your >mouth. .
Here is all the "research" I need. http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm Advertising, pure and simple. You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it all.
Response:
>I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted?
Two fingers.
Response:
>> I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? > Two fingers.
me. Enquiring minds want to know. Or at least my one insane mind does. — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
Queenie: Sorry to disagree here with you but I think you better go back and do some research here BEFORE you open up that yap of yours. You have been famous for posting messages without ANY research at all, and once again you proved yourself again as a fool. Go back in Google and do some research as to why this came about and then maybe just maybe you will understand…..opps I forgot you will NEVER understand as you think your point of view is always correct. I could try and explain how spam posts started to run amuck on here and how a change to the Charter was impossible. A compromise was suggested and Seacruise was asked if they would once again step in and help. We did and the problems since then have been kept down to almost nil when compared to other newsgroups. So you have yet to tell me how I or Seacruise make ANY money off of this? Either put up or shut up. Seacruise is proud to have one of the founding people of RTC as one of it’s crew. Sorry Queenie you are out of your league on this one. We are just doing as the majority on RTC want. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hey Queenie: >Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your >mouth. . > Here is all the "research" I need. > http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm > Advertising, pure and simple. > You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it > all.
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
>Queenie: >Sorry to disagree here with you but I think you better go back and do some >research here BEFORE you open up that yap of yours.
Here is all the "research" I need. http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm Advertising, pure and simple. You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it all. Amazing how you and the TA’s on this board will fight tooth and nail for your thinly disguised attempts to play within the Charter that all of you so highly regard….and then piss all over daily on this newsgroup. >Sorry Queenie you are out of your league on this one. We are just doing as >the majority on RTC want.
I missed that vote, Phil. Would you post the results again for all to see?
Response:
>>> I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? > Two fingers.
You’re not a "breast man" are you Hobbes? > Come on now, ya gotta tell >me. Enquiring minds want to know. Or at least my one insane mind does.
Two fingers is all that Hubby can get BETWEEN my two. Mystery solved.
Response:
>>>I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? >Two fingers. >"Two fingers"?? ><signed> >Karens, looking down her shirt
Yeah but you got that cute thing going on there. http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html More courage than I have.
Response:
>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >More courage than I have. >I just wish I ‘d have gotten another one when we were in the South >Pacific. What a great souvenir that would have been.
Did you have to stay out of the sun? I was under the impression that you had to.
Response:
>Next time, we’ll do it at the end of the trip and sit on the plane for >13 hours with new tattoos
Neat. I can hear Hans now. "Karens, I have a new line to get you to join the Mile High Club. Lemme see yours, I’ll let you see mine."
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>> http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >>> More courage than I have. >> I just wish I ‘d have gotten another one when we were in the South >> Pacific. What a great souvenir that would have been. > Did you have to stay out of the sun? I was under the impression that > you had to. > Yes, that’s why we skipped it last time. We were in Papeete for the > first few days of our trip before the cruise (this was on Ren), and we > would have had to stay out of the water for the first three-five days. > Next time, we’ll do it at the end of the trip and sit on the plane for > 13 hours with new tattoos
> Karen
Nice tattoo … I don’t have pictures of mine. On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated celebrating the new tattoo. Cathy
Response:
>>>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html
Cool tattoo, Karen. Howie – benchin today.
Response:
>Nice tattoo … I don’t have pictures of mine. >On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in >Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated >celebrating the new tattoo.
That’s different. Most stories are about people getting drunk and THEN getting a tattoo. LOL
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >Cool tattoo, Karen. > Thanks, Howard! >Howie – benchin today. > Go for it! > Karen, sitting very still in damp and dreary North Jersey
Now that I’ve seen your tattoo and I know you’re a night owl when cruising, I have one more question. Do you and Hans like to boogie? Howie – enervated
Response:
> You’re not a "breast man" are you Hobbes?
Heck yes I am! My whole life revolves around them! LOL > Two fingers is all that Hubby can get BETWEEN my two.
Ahhhh… I see, said the blind man. — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
>> On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in > Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated > celebrating the new tattoo. > Gee, I missed that part
I just went home and put "bag balm" > (don’t ask) on it, as instructed. > Karen
I made the mistake of inviting 2 girlfriends along when I had my last tattoo. They had both wanted one, but one of them was so freaked out by watching me that she’ll never get one. The other one waited 2-3 years and finally got one of her own. They are addicting. I’m planning my third … Cathy
Response:
> "Boogie" as in . . . ?
Move your legs, hips, pelvis, butt, arms, hands, and/or feet to a smooth or driving beat.
Response:
>> "Boogie" as in . . . ? >Move your legs, hips, pelvis, butt, arms, hands, and/or feet to a smooth >or driving meat.
LOL
Response:
Queenie: > Amazing how you and the TA’s on this board will fight tooth and nail > for your thinly disguised attempts to play within the Charter that all > of you so highly regard….and then piss all over daily on this > newsgroup.
I don’t need to fight tooth and nail as you put it. Seacruise is doing a service for RTC and till we are told otherwise we will continue to do it. > Would you post the results again for all to see?
No need to, I know what the results are and most do here, why should I do YOUR research that you should have done before you stuffed BOTH FEET into your mouth again. Now I have asked you twice where I or anyone one else on Seacruise makes any money on this. You have accused Seacruise as being a business and I have asked you to show me. Since you can not provide any evidence I suggest you shut up when you don’t have the facts. Sorry Queenie this is game set and match. Your out of your league on this one. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
Folks: I would like to Thank those that have agreed to write articles etc. for the FAQ’s. While no one has agreed to take on the FAQ them self at this point I am hoping someone will step forward. The Cruise Review Archive has 8 new reviews since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Feb 4 2004 Carnival Spirit Feb 9 2004 Carnival Fascination Feb 10 2004 Holland America Oosterdam Feb 10 2004 Royal Caribbean Radiance of the Seas Feb 11 2004 Royal Caribbean Radiance of the Seas Feb 13 2004 Carnival Legend Feb 13 2004 Carnival Legend Feb 13 2004 Holland America Zuiderdam Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be crossposted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) He could lead if he could get the lead out. 2) The dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are >encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be >no overt solicitation of business within postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, >dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping >are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with.
4. Provide RTC TA’s with the opportunity to abuse the spirit of the Charter with spamadvertising. Which brings us to crux of the matter. The Charter is a written, toothless document that is defined by the participants of RTC and by their show of (dis)approval of activities including TA spamadvertising. It is my take that the majority of RTCers are either apathetic to the constant spamadvertising, worn out by it or could care less about the issue. There are a few vocal minorities that raise this spamadvertising question and a vocal minority that fully supports the billboarding spamadvertisers like Goldenburger. So be it. Let the majority have what the majority does not address. The Not So Fine Art Of Google – Go To Top Of Thread http://makeashorterlink.com/?E29A321E6
Response:
Folks: Sorry this is a few days late but I have been dealing with ISP issues with Seacruise website. For those that can not access the website the server is in the process of being moved in the coming days. There should be no problems when this move takes place. The Cruise Review Archive has 1 new review since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Feb 23 2004 Carnival Ecstasy Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be crossposted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) I did not object to the object. 2) How can I intimate this to my most intimate friend?
Response:
>argumentative nature
Okay, I will never argue with others about which cruise, destination(s), ship or line is better or worse
-Heather Remove CanOspam to email http://members.aol.com/nookeybear/index1.htm
Response:
Folks: Sorry this is a few days late but I have been dealing with ISP issues with Seacruise website. For those that can not access the website the server is in the process of being moved in the coming days. There should be no problems when this move takes place. The Cruise Review Archive has 1 new review since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Feb 23 2004 Carnival Ecstasy Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be crossposted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) I did not object to the object. 2) How can I intimate this to my most intimate friend?
Response:
>argumentative nature
Okay, I will never argue with others about which cruise, destination(s), ship or line is better or worse
-Heather Remove CanOspam to email http://members.aol.com/nookeybear/index1.htm
Response:
Folks: I would like to Thank those that have agreed to write articles etc. for the FAQ’s. While no one has agreed to take on the FAQ them self at this point I am hoping someone will step forward. The Cruise Review Archive has 8 new reviews since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Feb 4 2004 Carnival Spirit Feb 9 2004 Carnival Fascination Feb 10 2004 Holland America Oosterdam Feb 10 2004 Royal Caribbean Radiance of the Seas Feb 11 2004 Royal Caribbean Radiance of the Seas Feb 13 2004 Carnival Legend Feb 13 2004 Carnival Legend Feb 13 2004 Holland America Zuiderdam Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be crossposted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) He could lead if he could get the lead out. 2) The dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are >encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be >no overt solicitation of business within postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, >dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping >are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with.
4. Provide RTC TA’s with the opportunity to abuse the spirit of the Charter with spamadvertising. Which brings us to crux of the matter. The Charter is a written, toothless document that is defined by the participants of RTC and by their show of (dis)approval of activities including TA spamadvertising. It is my take that the majority of RTCers are either apathetic to the constant spamadvertising, worn out by it or could care less about the issue. There are a few vocal minorities that raise this spamadvertising question and a vocal minority that fully supports the billboarding spamadvertisers like Goldenburger. So be it. Let the majority have what the majority does not address. The Not So Fine Art Of Google – Go To Top Of Thread http://makeashorterlink.com/?E29A321E6
Response:
Folks: I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted about the tragic accident on the QM2. The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of the Charter, they include. Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea Phil Seacruise rec.travel.cruises (unmoderated) CHARTER Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. Rec.travel.cruises will: 1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within postings). 2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of veteran cruises. 3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs to be familiar with. An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the FAQ’s. In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel newsgroups. End of Charter Link to the FAQ — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our charter bit the dust many moons ago — http://www.seacruisereviews.com Link to the Group cruise pages — http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no advertising for TA’s. Hypocrite – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Folks: >I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted >about the tragic accident on the QM2. >The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of >the Charter, they include. >Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration >Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus >Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn >Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian >Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation >Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium >Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea >Phil >Seacruise >rec.travel.cruises >(unmoderated) >CHARTER >Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information >and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not >be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and >lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise >ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship >personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. >Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly >welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money >back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. >cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own >cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise >industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion >will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. >Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion >provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within >postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore >excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs >to be familiar with. >An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. >These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). >Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write >reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the >FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking >into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive >listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the >FAQ’s. >In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion >on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific >cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming >personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly >urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a >minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to >rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel >newsgroups. >End of Charter >Link to the FAQ — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm >Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our >charter bit the dust many moons ago — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com >Link to the Group cruise pages — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm >Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm
Response:
I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of people with your comments. Phil Seacruise – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no > advertising for TA’s. > Hypocrite >Folks: >I avoided posting the Charter yesterday due to all the info being posted >about the tragic accident on the QM2. >The Cruise Review Archive has 7 new reviews since the last posting of >the Charter, they include. >Nov. 2 2003 Carnival Inspiration >Nov. 5 2003 Royal Olympia Odysseus >Nov. 6 2003 Norwegian Dawn >Nov. 6 2003 Princess Tahitian >Nov. 6 2003 Carnival Elation >Nov. 8 2003 Celebrity Millennium >Nov. 11 2003 Norwegian Sea >Phil >Seacruise >rec.travel.cruises >(unmoderated) >CHARTER >Rec.travel.cruises is a forum whose purpose is to provide information >and support to cruise ship travellers. Discussion might include (but not >be limited to) the relative merits of the various cruise ships and >lines, ports of embarkation, ports of call, shore excursions, cruise >ship activities, cuisine, entertainment, cruise ship >personnel, cruise ship management and the future of cruise ship travel. >Discussions related to getting the best deals on cruises will be highly >welcome. Such discussions might include early vs. late bookings, money >back guarantees, cruise protection insurance, the use of general vs. >cruise specific travel agencies and strategies for booking your own >cruises. Any topic that relates to cruise ship travel and the cruise >industry itself could be subject for discussion. In addition, discussion >will be allowed on the history of cruise ship and ocean liner travel. >Rec.travel.cruises will: >1. Help the traveller make an informed decision in how to book a >cruise without the pressure of a travel agent (travel agents are welcome >to the group and are encouraged to participate in the discussion >provided that there shall be no overt solicitation of business within >postings). >2. Provide the new cruiser with the benefit of the experience of >veteran cruises. >3. Provide the new cruiser with information as to what to expect once >he or she actually arrives on the ship ready to sail. Such topics as >cruise ship dress codes, dining room traditions, shopping, booking shore >excursions and tipping are all topics that the first time cruiser needs >to be familiar with. >An FTP site will be maintained for related rec.travel.cruises files. >These files will include a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s). >Members of the newsgroup who go on cruises will be asked to write >reviews of their experiences. These cruise reviews will be stored at the >FTP site and will serve as a very valuable resource to anyone looking >into sailing on the same ship or itinerary. In addition, a comprehensive >listing of all cruise ships and lines will be maintained as part of the >FAQ’s. >In summary, rec.travel.cruises encourages the free and open discussion >on all aspects of cruise ship travel. Justifiable criticism of specific >cruise ships and lines will be welcome up to the point of becoming >personal vendettas against a specific ship or line. Users are strongly >urged to keep messages of a confrontational or argumentative nature to a >minimum. Finally, it is requested that articles posted to >rec.travel.cruises not be cross posted to rec.travel or the other travel >newsgroups. >End of Charter >Link to the FAQ — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/faq.htm >Link to the Cruise Review Archives since the FTP site mentioned in our >charter bit the dust many moons ago — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com >Link to the Group cruise pages — >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtcgroupcruises.htm >Link to the RTC History — for your bedtime reading pleasure >http://www.seacruisereviews.com/rtchistory.htm
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
>I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of >people with your comments. >Phil >Seacruise > What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no > advertising for TA’s. > Hypocrite
Let me make it plain so that you won’t "loose allot" anymore. You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other reason that to expose your business to an international market of known cruisers who you want to sell cruises, etc to. I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your business. The Charter prohibits advertising. I’ll give you a minute and let that sink in. You have now established yourself as the Ultimate RTC Hypocrite Among TA’s. I’ll give you a life and let that sink in.
Response:
Hey Queenie: Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your mouth. . Seacruise is the first Cruise Chat Channel that was started in 1996. We are a non profit group that accepts no advertising or no money from Travel Agents. All moneys are free will donations from those on Seacruise. Seacruise agreed to keep the Charter and Post the Charter several years ago. As part of the Charter there is suppose to be a FTP site for reviews. Since FTP sites are pretty much a thing of the past http://seacruisereviews was born. As a matter of clarification SeacruiseReviews (Steve) also posts Group Cruises submitted to him as one post. You see there was a problem with Spam on RTC and it was agreed upon that Seacruise would provide this service FREE OF CHARGE to those that use it in one simple message. We accept nothing in return, except a simple Thank You. SeacruiseChat and SeacruiseReviews gains NOTHING. We are doing RTC a service and if you had done some research on Google you would have found this out, but you didn’t. Now I am going to suggest that you visit the links I listed and tell me where we are a business? Also visit this link http://seacruisereviews.com/rtccharter.htm and read the top of the page. I hope this clarifies any misunderstanding you have on what Seacruise is or about. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager > You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other reason > that to expose your business to an international market of known cruisers > who you want to sell cruises, etc to. > I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. > You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your business. The > Charter prohibits advertising.
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I think you lost me on this one, but coming from you, you loose allot of >people with your comments. >Phil >Seacruise >> What some people will go to get around the RTC Charter policy of no >> advertising for TA’s. >> Hypocrite >Let me make it plain so that you won’t "loose allot" anymore. >You posted the Charter and included your ad/sig line for no other >reason that to expose your business to an international market of >known cruisers who you want to sell cruises, etc to. >I’ll give you a second and let that sink in. >You used the Charter posting as your excuse to advertise your >business. The Charter prohibits advertising. >I’ll give you a minute and let that sink in. >You have now established yourself as the Ultimate RTC Hypocrite Among >TA’s. >I’ll give you a life and let that sink in.
Whoosh! That was the sound of reality slipping through your fingertips, Queenie. Trahn Where are the weapons of mass destruction?
Response:
> I’ll give you a second and let that sink in.
I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
>Hey Queenie: >Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your >mouth. .
Here is all the "research" I need. http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm Advertising, pure and simple. You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it all.
Response:
>I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted?
Two fingers.
Response:
>> I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? > Two fingers.
me. Enquiring minds want to know. Or at least my one insane mind does. — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
Queenie: Sorry to disagree here with you but I think you better go back and do some research here BEFORE you open up that yap of yours. You have been famous for posting messages without ANY research at all, and once again you proved yourself again as a fool. Go back in Google and do some research as to why this came about and then maybe just maybe you will understand…..opps I forgot you will NEVER understand as you think your point of view is always correct. I could try and explain how spam posts started to run amuck on here and how a change to the Charter was impossible. A compromise was suggested and Seacruise was asked if they would once again step in and help. We did and the problems since then have been kept down to almost nil when compared to other newsgroups. So you have yet to tell me how I or Seacruise make ANY money off of this? Either put up or shut up. Seacruise is proud to have one of the founding people of RTC as one of it’s crew. Sorry Queenie you are out of your league on this one. We are just doing as the majority on RTC want. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hey Queenie: >Maybe you should do some research before you insert BOTH feet into your >mouth. . > Here is all the "research" I need. > http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm > Advertising, pure and simple. > You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it > all.
– Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
Response:
>Queenie: >Sorry to disagree here with you but I think you better go back and do some >research here BEFORE you open up that yap of yours.
Here is all the "research" I need. http://www.seacruisereviews.com/links.htm Advertising, pure and simple. You can spin it anyway you way, Phillie, but this link above says it all. Amazing how you and the TA’s on this board will fight tooth and nail for your thinly disguised attempts to play within the Charter that all of you so highly regard….and then piss all over daily on this newsgroup. >Sorry Queenie you are out of your league on this one. We are just doing as >the majority on RTC want.
I missed that vote, Phil. Would you post the results again for all to see?
Response:
>>> I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? > Two fingers.
You’re not a "breast man" are you Hobbes? > Come on now, ya gotta tell >me. Enquiring minds want to know. Or at least my one insane mind does.
Two fingers is all that Hubby can get BETWEEN my two. Mystery solved.
Response:
>>>I gotta know. Just how full is fullbreasted? >Two fingers. >"Two fingers"?? ><signed> >Karens, looking down her shirt
Yeah but you got that cute thing going on there. http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html More courage than I have.
Response:
>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >More courage than I have. >I just wish I ‘d have gotten another one when we were in the South >Pacific. What a great souvenir that would have been.
Did you have to stay out of the sun? I was under the impression that you had to.
Response:
>Next time, we’ll do it at the end of the trip and sit on the plane for >13 hours with new tattoos
Neat. I can hear Hans now. "Karens, I have a new line to get you to join the Mile High Club. Lemme see yours, I’ll let you see mine."
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>> http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >>> More courage than I have. >> I just wish I ‘d have gotten another one when we were in the South >> Pacific. What a great souvenir that would have been. > Did you have to stay out of the sun? I was under the impression that > you had to. > Yes, that’s why we skipped it last time. We were in Papeete for the > first few days of our trip before the cruise (this was on Ren), and we > would have had to stay out of the water for the first three-five days. > Next time, we’ll do it at the end of the trip and sit on the plane for > 13 hours with new tattoos
> Karen
Nice tattoo … I don’t have pictures of mine. On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated celebrating the new tattoo. Cathy
Response:
>>>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html
Cool tattoo, Karen. Howie – benchin today.
Response:
>Nice tattoo … I don’t have pictures of mine. >On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in >Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated >celebrating the new tattoo.
That’s different. Most stories are about people getting drunk and THEN getting a tattoo. LOL
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>>http://www.cupcaked.com/cupcaked/tattoo.html >Cool tattoo, Karen. > Thanks, Howard! >Howie – benchin today. > Go for it! > Karen, sitting very still in damp and dreary North Jersey
Now that I’ve seen your tattoo and I know you’re a night owl when cruising, I have one more question. Do you and Hans like to boogie? Howie – enervated
Response:
> You’re not a "breast man" are you Hobbes?
Heck yes I am! My whole life revolves around them! LOL > Two fingers is all that Hubby can get BETWEEN my two.
Ahhhh… I see, said the blind man. — Klecko’s Komrades. All the way in 2003
Response:
>> On one of our previous cruises one of our tablemates got a tattoo in > Mexico … She missed dinner that night, as she was a wee bit intoxicated > celebrating the new tattoo. > Gee, I missed that part
I just went home and put "bag balm" > (don’t ask) on it, as instructed. > Karen
I made the mistake of inviting 2 girlfriends along when I had my last tattoo. They had both wanted one, but one of them was so freaked out by watching me that she’ll never get one. The other one waited 2-3 years and finally got one of her own. They are addicting. I’m planning my third … Cathy
Response:
> "Boogie" as in . . . ?
Move your legs, hips, pelvis, butt, arms, hands, and/or feet to a smooth or driving beat.
Response:
>> "Boogie" as in . . . ? >Move your legs, hips, pelvis, butt, arms, hands, and/or feet to a smooth >or driving meat.
LOL
Response:
Queenie: > Amazing how you and the TA’s on this board will fight tooth and nail > for your thinly disguised attempts to play within the Charter that all > of you so highly regard….and then piss all over daily on this > newsgroup.
I don’t need to fight tooth and nail as you put it. Seacruise is doing a service for RTC and till we are told otherwise we will continue to do it. > Would you post the results again for all to see?
No need to, I know what the results are and most do here, why should I do YOUR research that you should have done before you stuffed BOTH FEET into your mouth again. Now I have asked you twice where I or anyone one else on Seacruise makes any money on this. You have accused Seacruise as being a business and I have asked you to show me. Since you can not provide any evidence I suggest you shut up when you don’t have the facts. Sorry Queenie this is game set and match. Your out of your league on this one. Phil Seacruise Channel Manager — Seacruise http://www.seacruisechat.com Canal Cam Schedule http://www.seacruisechat.com/panamacanal/ Cruise Review Archive http://www.seacruisereviews.com English you say? 1) A bass was painted on the head of the bass drum. 2) Since there is no time like the present, he thought it was time to present the present.
